From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaushal Modi Subject: Section on #+include keyword is missing quite some info in the org-manual.org Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:23:39 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4ziD-0004Ta-1s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:38:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4zUw-00085S-Ui for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:24:19 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::233]:45424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4zUw-00084z-Mg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:24:18 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id x16-v6so17238883ljd.12 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:24:18 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-org list Hello, I was visiting the Org manual to verify if I got the :only-contents parameter of #+include keyword correct, and noticed that that info is completely missing from that section in the new org-manual.org. Reverting back to older texi, it is missing pieces like below and much more too: #+INCLUDE: "./paper.org::#theory" :only-contents t @r{Include the body of the heading with the custom id @samp{theory}} #+INCLUDE: "./paper.org::mytable" @r{Include named element.} #+INCLUDE: "./paper.org::*conclusion" :lines 1-20 @r{Include the first 20 lines of the headline named @samp{conclusion}.} If this is not intentional (looks like it's not because that feature works great and I would miss it if it did not), I can commit update to org-manual.org with that whole section restored from the past. But I am wondering if things are more serious.. how do we ensure that the org-manual.org is not missing out the useful info from the old org.texi? -- Kaushal Modi