From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kaushal Modi Subject: Re: org-table bindings available outside org tables too? Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 21:07:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <877fej9oek.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137314087a25905339cf14d Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JXy-0002G9-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:07:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JXw-0004F0-Pj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:07:25 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]:34752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JXw-0004Et-KU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:07:24 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id b65so47606543oia.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:07:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877fej9oek.fsf@saiph.selenimh> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-org list --001a1137314087a25905339cf14d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:44 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > We do not have a char map specific to tables. > > In most cases, bindings are context-aware (see, e.g., the dauting C-c > C-c). However, the bindings you cite are not claimed by other parts of > Org, so they just do table specific stuff. > Thanks for the reply. In that case, I think that the bind-keys approach is clean enough if a user wants to prevent the org-table-* fn bindings from shadowing their global map bindings when the point is not in a table. -- -- Kaushal Modi --001a1137314087a25905339cf14d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 24= , 2016 at 4:44 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
Hello,

We do not have a char map specific to tables.

In most cases, bindings are context-aware (see, e.g., the dauting C-c
C-c). However, the bindings you cite are not claimed by other parts of
Org, so they just do table specific stuff.

<= div>Thanks for the reply.=C2=A0

In that case, I th= ink that the bind-keys approach is clean enough if a user wants to prevent = the org-table-* fn bindings from shadowing their global map bindings when t= he point is not in a table.
--
=

--
Kaushal Modi

--001a1137314087a25905339cf14d--