From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ?
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:36:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFyQvY2Z7cvRVb1fMpiGGG1NN-ynb=avyceC_k2xCGTj9_1m_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <531a7f93882cc0d5d09700457d06ea082f47569b.camel@flqt.fr>
	<E1g0IPY-000465-4I@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<tqd0thctb6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39899)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1g0Tg4-0004f4-AH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:37:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1g0Tg3-0005XK-OL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:37:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <tqd0thctb6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Cc: n@flqt.fr, emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>, 32722@debbugs.gnu.org

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:28 AM Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Emacs already includes htmlfontify, since 23.2.
> Is there some obstacle to Org using that? (bug#7506)

This has been discussed before on the Org mailing list.

>From what I remember, there is not objection to use that instead; it's
just that someone has to work on converting ox-html to use htmlfontify
instead of htmlize.