From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jay Kerns Subject: inline Babel calls in math environments and table cells Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:54:33 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF9wq-0000rD-2R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:07:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF9wn-0004Nj-R1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:07:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]:38261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF9kE-0000Dc-9V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:54:54 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u28so1701620qcs.22 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:54:53 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List Greetings, I am in the process of updating materials to the new exporter in anticipation of Org 8.0. It appears that inline SRC blocks are not being evaluated in table cells and math environments in the new exporter, for instance, something like this: \( SRC_R[:exports results]{2+3} \) or like this: | SRC_R[:exports results]{2+3} | Is the above intentional? I am reading the Org Syntax document and it looks like inline Babel calls are "objects". It also looks like the pair \(...\) is a "LaTeX fragment" (also an object). At the beginning of the section it says, "Most objects cannot contain objects." And it also says right above that, "Objects can be found in... table cells." If my reading of the syntax is correct then it would look like the latter example is meant to be supported while the former example is not. Am I reading that correctly? Thank you, -- Jay P.S. I've tried all possible settings of #+OPTIONS and of :mode settings in the #+attr_latex line for the table. P.P.S. Best-case scenario for me would be both examples supported, but if not then I am willing to live with it or try to write something that will support it.