From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabrice Popineau Subject: Re: ox-html, top-row-p Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 23:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lh8wzlwa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761008vnm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1a3284161d80526f764de Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8yAr-0007AE-T6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:34:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8yAq-00066g-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:34:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]:36761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8yAq-00066b-Qd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:34:24 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-x232.google.com with SMTP id no2so18693454obc.3 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:34:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8761008vnm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" --001a11c1a3284161d80526f764de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-12-15 0:20 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Goaziou : > Fabrice Popineau writes: > > > I am not fond of eval at all, at least not in this specific case. > > So yes, your way is at least as good as what I did. > > Fine. Would you want to provide a patch along these lines? It may > require an entry in ORG-NEWS. > > I'll do it but some more urgent things to do right now. Fabrice --001a11c1a3284161d80526f764de Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-12-15 0:20 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr= >:
Fabrice= Popineau <fabrice.popinea= u@gmail.com> writes:

> I am not fond of eval at all, at least not in this specific case.
> So yes, your way is at least as good as what I did.

Fine. Would you want to provide a patch along these lines? It may require an entry in ORG-NEWS.


I'll do it but some more urgent things to do rig= ht now.

Fabrice

--001a11c1a3284161d80526f764de--