Seems ok to me. Great !
I've added support for "againframe", as specified above. Is it workingFabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr> writes:
>> Interesting. What about providing an "againframe" environment (on par
>> with "appendix", "note", etc.)?
>>
>> It would use "BEAMER_act" property to set the overlay specification, and
>> a "BEAMER_ref" property using link syntax to refer to a particular
>> section. Here's an example:
>>
>>
> That would be a nice idea. This againframe is quite used.
> And your proposal is much cleaner wrt to the org syntax than my current
> hack.
as expected, or am I missing something?
--
Nicolas Goaziou