From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lawrence Bottorff Subject: Re: HTML export for math markup Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:12:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <58740FFD.7020100@free.fr> <88f10863f4f94677abfb0514800db64f@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87y3yjgwa2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d30bc98cac30545bd3d3e Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQwEM-0001Rw-1e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:12:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQwEK-0000t1-VR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:12:50 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]:33097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQwEK-0000sw-Qt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:12:48 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w204so47842923oiw.0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 05:12:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y3yjgwa2.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eric S Fraga , emacs-orgmode Mailinglist --001a113d30bc98cac30545bd3d3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, I tested all my header lines and found that was the 'offender." It got there on someone's suggestion it was needed for proper TikZ. Or was it bibtex? Or does a ton of pngs come if you choose Latex preview? No time for further investigation. Confusion will be my epitaph. . . . On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 Jan 2017 at 00:13, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > > This is the entirety of my header section. I'm sure there are > > redundancies etc. But again, the clean vanilla of Emacs 25.1.1 and > > org-mode 9.0.2 is defaulting to producing png's. > > [...] > > > #+OPTIONS: tex:imagemagick > > Maybe this is the problem? > > -- > : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 26.0.50.1, Org release_9.0.3-189-ge46676 > --001a113d30bc98cac30545bd3d3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, I tested all my header lines and found that was the &= #39;offender." It got there on someone's suggestion it was needed = for proper TikZ. Or was it bibtex? Or does a ton of pngs come if you choose= Latex preview? No time for further investigation. Confusion will be my epi= taph. . . .

= On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
On Tuesday,= 10 Jan 2017 at 00:13, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> This is the entirety of my header section. I'm sure there are
> redundancies etc. But again, the clean vanilla of Emacs 25.1.1 and
> org-mode 9.0.2 is defaulting to producing png's.

[...]

> #+OPTIONS: tex:imagemagick

Maybe this is the problem?

--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 26.0.50.1, Org release_9.0.3-189-ge46676=

--001a113d30bc98cac30545bd3d3e--