From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lawrence Bottorff Subject: Re: Parens matching off in babel code block Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 21:11:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <5ccb4155.1c69fb81.e3d19.0601@mx.google.com> <847eb88uu7.fsf@gmail.com> <87imusbkpk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002bc16d0587f24434" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMNfW-0008Rs-MS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 22:11:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMNfV-0001Sl-Hr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 22:11:22 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::132]:43622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMNfV-0001Rw-8A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 22:11:21 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id u27so3049921lfg.10 for ; Thu, 02 May 2019 19:11:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87imusbkpk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist --0000000000002bc16d0587f24434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Well, at least there is a sane explanation. Ironically, I was also about to complain about all my loose ">"s getting flagged. So they are related! Would there be a way to make an exception for < and > inside of actual code forms? Languages need them for "greater than" and "less than". On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:39 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marco Wahl writes: > > > Using < and > as parenthesis in Org is questionable, I think. > > In Org syntax, < and > often come in pair (timestamps, some links, > targets, radio targets). There is at least some interest in the current > behaviour. > > > Also this behavior is not documented AFAICT. > > I don't think you can document every single detail. Even if it was > possible, it wouldn't be desirable. > > > What about removing this special? Or does anyone enjoy this behavior? > > This needs to be carefully tested and weighted. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > > --0000000000002bc16d0587f24434 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, at least there is a sane explanation. Ironically, I = was also about to complain about all my loose ">"s getting fla= gged. So they are related! Would there be a way to make an exception for &l= t; and > inside of actual code forms? Languages need them for "grea= ter than" and "less than".

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:39 PM Nic= olas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaz= iou.fr> wrote:
Hello,

Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> writes:

> Using < and > as parenthesis in Org is questionable, I think.=C2= =A0

In Org syntax, < and > often come in pair (timestamps, some links, targets, radio targets). There is at least some interest in the current
behaviour.

> Also this behavior is not documented AFAICT.

I don't think you can document every single detail. Even if it was
possible, it wouldn't be desirable.

> What about removing this special?=C2=A0 Or does anyone enjoy this beha= vior?

This needs to be carefully tested and weighted.

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

--0000000000002bc16d0587f24434--