Well, at least there is a sane explanation. Ironically, I was also about to complain about all my loose ">"s getting flagged. So they are related! Would there be a way to make an exception for < and > inside of actual code forms? Languages need them for "greater than" and "less than".
Hello,
Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> writes:
> Using < and > as parenthesis in Org is questionable, I think.
In Org syntax, < and > often come in pair (timestamps, some links,
targets, radio targets). There is at least some interest in the current
behaviour.
> Also this behavior is not documented AFAICT.
I don't think you can document every single detail. Even if it was
possible, it wouldn't be desirable.
> What about removing this special? Or does anyone enjoy this behavior?
This needs to be carefully tested and weighted.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou