From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Machulis Subject: Sticky agenda status? Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:59:37 +0800 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIUrV-0003hJ-MW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:59:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIUrU-0001RI-3A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:59:41 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:55396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIUrT-0001Q3-SH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:59:40 -0400 Received: by lbao2 with SMTP id o2so2298930lba.0 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:59:37 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Just curious if the sticky agenda branch is going to land as a feature at some point, or if there was some discussion on what's blocking it that I'm missing? There was lots of action last month then silence, and it looks like the branch has bitrotted against the trunk now. Was kinda looking forward to it as a feature. :)