Re: [oc-basic] fontification weirdness

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 4:57 PM Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I can't fully pin this down, but I and a couple of others I've
> > discussed this with are seeing the following behavior.
> >
> > With this example:
> >
> > a citation [cite:@couper2014] and another [cite:@kohn2006]
> >
> > ... the first citation is highlighted, and the second (and any
> > subsequent) is not.
> >
> > In some way I can't reproduce, I can then get the fontification to
> > work correctly, but if I restart, the problem reappears.
> >
> > Discussed more here:
> >
> > https://github.com/bdarcus/citar/discussions/430#discussioncomment-1693707
> >
> > Can anyone else confirm this?
>
> I couldn't reproduce it, but I saw something fishy in the fontification
> code. I fixed it. Hopefully, your problem is gone, too. Crossing
> fingers.

I haven't yet had a chance to test the latest commit, but another user
did and reported:

"I have what I think is this commit (b3cc2f793, the latest one as of
right now) and the above bug still happens for me."

-----------
His explanation of that bug, which I can reproduce on my end:

I can replicate this behaviour with two citations on one line, but
only when the first citation is a valid reference key:

[cite:@Sno1959:TwoCultures] [cite:@Snow]

Just changing one character in the first citation key causes the
second to flip between being highlighted or not.
-------------

So to be clear:

Two citations on one line.

If both keys are valid, the second one is not highlighted.

If I change the first key so it is invalid, both are then highlighted.

Can you reproduce that?

Bruce