Re: [org-cite] issues with org-cite-make-insert-processor select-style

["Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

BTW, here's the info from the debugger:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Wrong argument type(s)")
error("Wrong argument type(s)")
org-cite-make-insert-processor(bibtex-actions-org-cite-insert
bibtex-actions-org-cite-select-style)
(org-cite-register-processor 'bibtex-actions-org-cite
:insert (org-cite-make-insert-processor
#'bibtex-actions-org-cite-insert
#'bibtex-actions-org-cite-select-style)
:follow #'bibtex-actions-org-cite-follow)
load-with-code-conversion("/home/bruce/.config/emacs/.local/straight/build-28..."
"/home/bruce/.config/emacs/.local/straight/build-28..." nil t)
require(bibtex-actions-org-cite nil nil)

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:14 AM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have run into a problem in implementing a "select-style" function
> for an org-cite-insert-processor.
>
> The WIP code is here:
>
> https://github.com/bdarcus/bibtex-actions/pull/182
>
> It was running correctly yesterday morning, but now it doesn't.
>
> I have two related issues:
>
> 1. I think, but am not sure, I may have run into a bug in
> org-cite-make-insert-processor, as the function I am using for the
> select-style parameter runs correctly outside of the insert processor,
> and returns the same results as the "org-cite-basic--complete-style"
> function. But when I uncomment the parameter to use it on the org-cite
> insert processor, it not only doesn't work correctly, but Emacs won't
> even load fully.
>
> 2. The error I get "wrong type" is so general it literally took me
> hours to realize it was coming from this function; I was looking
> elsewhere for the issue.
>
> So if I'm right about a bug, obviously it would be great if that could be fixed.
>
> But better error handling and reporting would also be really great.
>
> Bruce
>
> PS - I"m still learning elisp, and so am not super knowledgeable about
> debugging in general. If anyone has any tips on that, that could help
> me narrow down the source of the error, that would be much
> appreciated.