From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yasushi SHOJI Subject: Re: DEADLINE: position in entry Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:09:35 +0900 Message-ID: References: <8737ilifj7.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145388ee0404c0541f368d2 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Scc-0006M8-6O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:09:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Scb-0002ag-2N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:09:38 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]:34026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Sca-0002aA-UD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:09:37 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c21so11166965ioj.1 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:09:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --001a1145388ee0404c0541f368d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > > Yasushi SHOJI writes: > > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ---- > > * DONE org > > DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39] > > > > SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w> > > > > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ---- > > A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>. > > [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense... thanks for your comment. chainging the inactive timestamp to active doesn't seem to change the behavior. even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse to show a closed entry, isn't it? -- yashi --001a1145388ee0404c0541f368d2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vaub= an <sva-news@mygooglest.com> wrote:
>
> Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com> writes:
> > ---- &= gt;8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
> > * DONE org
> > =C2=A0 D= EADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
> >
> > =C2=A0 SCHEDULED:= <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
> >
> > ---- >8 ---- cut = ---- >8 ----
>
> A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <= >.
>
> [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense...

th= anks for your comment.
chainging the inactive timestamp to active d= oesn't seem
to change the behavior.

<= div>even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse
= to show a closed entry, isn't it?
--=C2=A0
=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 yashi

--001a1145388ee0404c0541f368d2--