From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: setting local variables Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:22:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871sotiqld.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2wsly88.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877eykbpho.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wp5dmkm0.fsf@gmx.us> <87h8wh13tm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y3psp5ne.fsf@gmx.us> <87mv68159v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h8wgov62.fsf@gmx.us> <87fuc0asaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3pr7pn2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874lsfaho3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pob2opic.fsf@gmx.us> <87k21azncs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bmmm4kny.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <08f7ca4a-a19e-8dcb-b877-d306dda5c5b4@gmail.com> <87vakco0f5.fsf@gmx.us> <877ewr7t8j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c11f61f64a30559c213a1" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59677) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvIIQ-0005qT-Sy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:22:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvIIP-0003KE-RL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:22:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:46610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvIIP-0003Jb-Jt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:22:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m72so1244709wmc.1 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:22:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877ewr7t8j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: org-mode list , Rasmus --f403045c11f61f64a30559c213a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Nicolas, thanks! Carsten On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Carsten Dominik writes: > > > yes, I am aware that LaTeX does use unnumbered for this, but this is > > backend specific implementation, and not an argument about the logic of > > this approach. > > Fair enough. I reverted the commit. > > I think a :NOTOC: property to ignore headlines from TOC is an acceptable > solution, even though it add yet another property. > > I also suggest to classify LaTeX issue as "wontfix". > > Any objection? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou > --f403045c11f61f64a30559c213a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Nicolas,

thanks!

Carsten

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Nicolas Goaziou = <mail@nicola= sgoaziou.fr> wrote:
Hello,<= br>
Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>= ; writes:

> yes, I am aware that LaTeX does use unnumbered for this, but this is > backend specific implementation, and not an argument about the logic o= f
> this approach.

Fair enough. I reverted the commit.

I think a :NOTOC: property to ignore headlines from TOC is an acceptable solution, even though it add yet another property.

I also suggest to classify LaTeX issue as "wontfix".

Any objection?

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

--f403045c11f61f64a30559c213a1--