> What doesn't work? I.e., what is produced and what did you expect

instead?

The jump via C-c C-o didn't work for me. But I figured it out in a meanwhile - supposedly, what was previously called "thisfile" link type is now called "fuzzy". Thanks.

> IIUC MELPAe they should already be available.

Sorry, I meant, Org ELPA (http://orgmode.org/elpa/) not MELPA (org is not published on MELPA at all). The last published package seem to be http://orgmode.org/elpa/org-20150817.tar which doesn't contain the fix. So, my question is - when the next package (that contains the fix) will be published? Or, alternatively, what's the Org policy for publishing new packages to ELPA?

--
Best regards,
Sergei Nosov

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

Sergei Nosov <sergei.nosov@gmail.com> writes:

> 1. Previously, the type of the link was "thisfile", now it's "custom-id"
> and also, the leading hash is removed from the link. Let's consider
> the [[#about][About]]
> example once again. Previously, I was given ("thisfile" . "#about") and I
> changed this to ("thisfile" . "About"), which then worked like a charm.
> Now, I'm given ("custom-id" . "about"), which I don't know how I should
> translate. Neither of ("custom-id" . "About") or ("id" . "About") work.
> What should it be?

What doesn't work? I.e., what is produced and what did you expect
instead?

> BTW, there's a line (require 'ord-id) in org-open-at-point function in
> master. Probably, it's a typo (should be (require 'org-id))

Fixed. Thank you.

> 2. When those fixes will be available in MELPA?

IIUC MELPAe they should already be available.

Regards,