From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: York Zhao Subject: Re: commit 5ea0228 has problem opening big org-mode file Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:17:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871u255cla.fsf@gmail.com> <878uwcbes9.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87wqjv0xul.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87iove2tow.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlpIA-0007Z6-JW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:17:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlpI9-0006E4-Q2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:17:14 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]:42890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlpI9-0006Dc-9u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:17:13 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id at1so12882854iec.21 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:17:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87iove2tow.fsf@Rainer.invalid> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode > The only path that needs to be in load-path is the lisp directory for > org-mode, which is the second line (that you say is "key"). You are right on this which I didn't realize before you pointed out, thanks. Anyways, in my configuration I always have both lines, and I'm going to delete the first line. And also, when I was trying to reproduce the issue in a minimum setup, I deleted the second line then the problem didn't show up which I now realized was simply because I ended up running the `org-mode' shipped with Emacs 24.3, my bad, sorry for the confusion. > Unless you have created your completely original way of "installing" Org, then > only the second line is needed. As explained above, yes, my `org-mode' is in some other path outside of Emacs, e.g., "foo/org-mode", which I had already explained, I'm going to delete the first line. But it doesn't hurt to have the first line anyways right? > If you do have created your own completely original way of "installing" Org, > then please don't expect anybody else to be able to help. It should have been clear by now that this was a "real" problem totally unrelated to "my own completely original way of installing Org" and had been addressed properly. I'm not sure if you had tried my reproducer. > Yes, because you wouldn't load any of the new code. Already explained on this in previous paragraphs. > Maybe because your "installation" is borked, No, my installation had never broken, and as we've all seen, the problem has nothing to do with my "broken installation". > but we can't know because you never provided enough information to tell. I'm pretty sure I had provided pretty effective reproducer with which Nicolas had successfully reproduced the issue. By the way, it took me two hours to isolate it from my own .emacs (over 400KB). > There's a reason for org-submit-bug-report to exist; among other things it > includes information about the Emacs and Org version and clueas as to how the > installation is set up. I didn't know that, thanks for telling me. York