From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luciano Passuello <lucianop@litemind.com>
Subject: Re: Insert heading above current one
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:50:34 -0300
Message-ID: <CACqKfLdFH310GfKQOPFOL2G+JfXXTWoD6v5de8TBaYQPkkBwnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACqKfLdJSRYiYi97E64GJhvsV5uCvwD-13Aaw7+aApS2uFN6iQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFyQvY1AMPFw6urb5kVwT98h6Qw4A8w7WJDM-u9KzZDZdbETyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFyQvY0t7RkgVkpPs31sYbhSGvKLwySE43N7-su2vhUXnz7YAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<874lrlmg9u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CACqKfLeiOkTPSyhS5WnvYcg0OUCDfQYYpN-kZdPjLV8TwgQcag@mail.gmail.com>
	<87mv5clk4v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CACqKfLc4RxZ3-kVRyza_sv7s34DFc4kxFWD=CGMr6zu8E8E=TQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wp4gj5t1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33713)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lucianop@litemind.com>) id 1dyOjJ-0002ae-UT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:51:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lucianop@litemind.com>) id 1dyOiv-0002DP-Fe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:51:21 -0400
Received: from vps2.litemind.com ([192.159.65.166]:60474)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lucianop@litemind.com>)
	id 1dyOiv-0002D3-8i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:50:57 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:53361)
	by vps2.litemind.com with esmtpsa
	(TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <lucianop@litemind.com>) id 1dyOiu-0006kv-2p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:50:56 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 23so2516155lfs.10
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wp4gj5t1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Luciano Passuello <lucianop@litemind.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> M-RET and C-RET/C-u M-RET are
> different beasts, just don't expect them to behave exactly the same.

And then you hit exactly the heart of our discussion right there.
Im my line of reasoning, org-insert-heading and
org-insert-heading-respect-content should behave exactly the same,
except for the fact that org-insert-heading-respect-content should,
well, respect the content; Other than that, they should be 100%
symmetric.

> I stand on my ground: current behaviour is better.
Given we're not striving for behavior symmetry, I can see your point.

Regards,