From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ilya Shlyakhter <ilya_shl@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required?
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:25:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CACfYvRYUYeP8wTku-7dtmn4fuynNb1KfEJxYFbQafiPfZM-hvg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPaq-gPEPrun74X_m-ULQpZgs3BLu_zTG0WR=9B9DoJQkok6wg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120730144259.GA1017@nausicaa.localdomain>
	<CAHRqSkRgnZYqYcqxrWaj+Hs25yszLbBUFeUgbCoPWHKSMLVFxQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3obmwnjxn.fsf@quad.robs.office> <jvjojd$81f$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<873941bsvs.fsf@gnu.org> <501ED1B7.5070808@alum.mit.edu>
	<87lihtasl3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CACfYvRZULcC+h5DCedOOheAWfoUnOWBq6eG2D8vLT46uXLgrnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaq-gNyS7OgKVEW750-T-3bS8aYqfppzqcEsnrpw749gW4sCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACfYvRbDW-KfPBggUwyaC_t2FWA4i8YUoU2yvtR_ARpPbax4cw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHRqSkTj0-nnH9OkXQjg9vsAHUsm7wMR0Xgv_7fciBcGnP0ckA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ilya239@gmail.com>) id 1SyR3j-00019L-A5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:25:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ilya239@gmail.com>) id 1SyR3i-0007ud-91
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:25:39 -0400
Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:64204)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ilya239@gmail.com>) id 1SyR3i-0007uV-4Z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:25:38 -0400
Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so3097706yen.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHRqSkTj0-nnH9OkXQjg9vsAHUsm7wMR0Xgv_7fciBcGnP0ckA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jonathan Leech-Pepin <jonathan.leechpepin@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Jonathan Leech-Pepin
<jonathan.leechpepin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The issue I can see with completely hiding :PROPERTIES: line is
> that you would then run the risk of adding text at the wrong
> location (between the headline and the drawer for example).  At
> the moment when the drawer is folded you know if the point is
> before, within or after the drawer (even though you still can
> remove parts of :end: by accident with backspaces), if it isn't
> visible at all you don't have that ability.

Maybe, Org should allow text between the headline and the drawer?
Is there a reason not to?

Alternately, if a UNIVERSAL_PROPERTIES drawer was always on the line immediately
following the headline, there would be no way to place text between it
and the headilne.

Also, maybe a hidden drawer could be protected by setting character
properties on it
to make it unmodifiable?