From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roland Everaert <reveatwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Agenda View - Table report - Granularity of time computed
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:14:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CACdPZ9KLmaQtkYp_RCdhYzzkQqqA0RKT4qzhGsfX-ZZ6kD9UBA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148ecc24191a80550e0c857"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48230)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <reveatwork@gmail.com>) id 1dGKJ8-0004OV-2O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:14:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <reveatwork@gmail.com>) id 1dGKJ7-00079H-9h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:14:10 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:38793)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <reveatwork@gmail.com>)
	id 1dGKJ7-00078N-2r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:14:09 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n195so19169834wmg.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

--001a1148ecc24191a80550e0c857
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

I have noticed that the computation of time in the agenda report (key 'R')
is based on the granularity of the functions to increment or decrements
time in a clock entry inside a logbook.

I know that this granularity can be changed and that I could set it to 1,
but why the time computation in the agenda report is influenced by that
granularity?


Regards,


Roland.

--001a1148ecc24191a80550e0c857
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br></div>I have noticed that t=
he computation of time in the agenda report (key &#39;R&#39;) is based on t=
he granularity of the functions to increment or decrements time in a clock =
entry inside a logbook.<br><br></div>I know that this granularity can be ch=
anged and that I could set it to 1, but why the time computation in the age=
nda report is influenced by that granularity?<br><br><br></div>Regards,<br>=
<br><br></div>Roland.<br></div>

--001a1148ecc24191a80550e0c857--