I will surely state the obvious, but the output of this discussion is that ther4e is a need for everybody, what ever our relationship to org-mode or emacs, needs a way to filter the various conversation about org-mode on the various communication channel used by the project.

This mainly imply this ML and if there is a way to pre-format messages we want to send to the ML it will make filtering easier.

In fact, a good approach would be the same as for todo state.

Example of message states:
[QUESTION] -> [ANSWER]
[BUG] -> ( [CONFIRMED] | [WONTFIX] | [SOLVED] )
[CONFIRMED] -> ( [SOLVED] | [PLANNED] )
[FEATURE] -> ( [WONTDO] | [PLANNED] | [IMPLEMENTED] )
[PLANNED] -> ( [IMPLEMENTED] | [SOLVED] )

Of Course, nothing should prevent moving a message from [BUG] to [QUESTION] for example.

Hope this will help go on with a solution and an actual implementation, I suppose mainly documentation on the org website and configuration for all of us.

Regards,

Roland.


On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:32 PM Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> wrote:
Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> - As pointed out, Org has a bug tracker : Emacs' Debbugs. See
>>   <https://debbugs.gnu.org/Emacs.html>. Org users do not send bugs
>>   through it much.
>
> (In the event that they do, should whoever follows bug-gnu-emacs refer
> these users to emacs-orgmode?)

Maybe a first step would be changing `org-submit-bug-report' to submit
the bug to debbugs, not to this mailing list?

I know I'd be happy to help with bug triage, but I don't go wading
through this mailing list like I used to. I do use debbugs for other
stuff, though, and it would be easy to add an extra filter that I check
regularly.

2¢...