From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Subject: Fwd: Largest org file you have + performance Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:33:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255574fe1f994e04a9778a61 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnzAn-0002St-2N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:33:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnzAl-0004zO-Lm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:33:13 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:58565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnzAl-0004zJ-HB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:33:11 -0400 Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so6256118fxg.0 for ; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:33:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode --0003255574fe1f994e04a9778a61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [O] Largest org file you have + performance To: suvayu ali I think emacs on OSX underperforms significantly, at least comparing to its Linux counterpart. I might be wrong... The reference file is slow by itself, agenda commands are slow, but acceptable. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, suvayu ali wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa > wrote: > > What platform? OSX? > > Linux x86_64 > > I also have other files which are larger (~3k lines) but they are not > in the agenda files. These other files have lots of source code blocks > and are meant for exporting to pdf via latex. > > -- > Suvayu > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. > --0003255574fe1f994e04a9778a61 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

---------- Forwarded message ----------<= br>From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [O] Largest org file you = have + performance
To: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>


I think emacs= on OSX underperforms significantly, at least comparing to its Linux counte= rpart. I might be wrong...=A0

The reference file is slow by itself, agenda commands are sl= ow, but acceptable.


On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:27 PM, suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
<celoserpa@gmai= l.com> wrote:
> What platform? OSX?

Linux x86_64

I also have other files which are larger (~3k lines) but they are not
in the agenda files. These other files have lots of source code blocks
and are meant for exporting to pdf via latex.

--
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.


--0003255574fe1f994e04a9778a61--