From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celoserpa@gmail.com>
Subject: [OT] Current website not very attractive
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:45:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CACHMzOEoaTDU5beqAshxJ4LExf-OxF07i6cooQ_+SHLAwnob0A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23494bde756104c6dc26f2
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54212)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <celoserpa@gmail.com>) id 1SzaYG-0002FN-AQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:45:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <celoserpa@gmail.com>) id 1SzaYF-0003Oj-Ep
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:45:56 -0400
Received: from mail-gg0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:34195)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <celoserpa@gmail.com>) id 1SzaYF-0003OT-6O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:45:55 -0400
Received: by ggnf4 with SMTP id f4so1108565ggn.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

--e89a8f23494bde756104c6dc26f2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey list,

Don't want to be negative, but doesn't anyone else also think the current
design is kind of amateurish and not very attractive? I also did not like
the screenshot used, I preferred the previous one, it showed more org
capabilities, and the colors and indentation looked better.

My two cents and food for thought,

- Marcelo.

--e89a8f23494bde756104c6dc26f2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey list,<div><br></div><div>Don&#39;t want to be negative, but doesn&#39;t=
 anyone else also think the current design is kind of amateurish and not ve=
ry attractive? I also did not like the screenshot used, I preferred the pre=
vious one, it showed more org capabilities, and the colors and indentation =
looked better.</div>
<div><br></div><div>My two cents and food for thought,</div><div><br></div>=
<div>- Marcelo.</div><div><br></div>

--e89a8f23494bde756104c6dc26f2--