From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo de Moraes Serpa Subject: TaskWarrior <> OrgMode integration Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013a0a0057588f3f5" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzROx-00011F-Gw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:59:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzROl-0000x4-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:59:01 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]:41758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzROk-0000wi-SU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:58:58 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k12-v6so42260853oiw.8 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Org Mode --00000000000013a0a0057588f3f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I've given TaskWarrior a try this weekend it's actually quite nice. The advantage it has over org is that it's more suitable for a gtd(ish) system out-of-the-box, you don't need to tinker with anything and the reports are great. Integrating TaskWarrior with orgmode might make sense. My idea is that in addition to what it already does, TaskWarrior could be used as a capture tool for org, meaning TW tasks could be stored in a an org file, using the org format. This way, if you don't want to tinker with org to make it more suitable for GTD, you can just use TW for what it is good at, and org for what it's better at (taking notes for the tasks, etc) and you can even mix-and-match, sometimes using org or sometimes TW from the CLI, both sharing the same org text file. Do you think such an integration would make sense? - Marcelo. --00000000000013a0a0057588f3f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've given TaskWarrior a try this weekend it's act= ually quite nice. The advantage it has over org is that it's more suita= ble for a gtd(ish) system out-of-the-box, you don't need to tinker with= anything and the reports are great.

Integrating TaskWar= rior with orgmode might make sense. My idea is that in addition to what it = already does, TaskWarrior could be used as a capture tool for org, meaning = TW tasks could be stored in a an org file, using the org format.
=
This way, if you don't want to tinker with org to make i= t more suitable for GTD, you can just use TW for what it is good at, and or= g for what it's better at (taking notes for the tasks, etc) and you can= even mix-and-match, sometimes using org or sometimes TW from the CLI, both= sharing the same org text file.

Do you think such= an integration would make sense?=C2=A0

- Marcelo.=


--00000000000013a0a0057588f3f5--