From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AHu3J9cDwV++egAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:49:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4AyBI9cDwV+oZQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:49:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0BE940363 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kie7Y-0000hS-SQ for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:49:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kie6j-0000hE-Mo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:48:17 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:33933) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kie6g-0007Sv-BY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:48:17 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a15so5799652edy.1 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 05:48:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0M7RN1o1sZmIjhiXgwXF6PwbyESZ182BdGD/flizwRs=; b=pwVr9MoiXZbxredbAk7gK+pLymJz7xa9ChTw9QO6067x/nvjValul689RcCjuWamat YQUmfmRJToZr2q8zl0j+qCBS24pBExryRZV8hIzxOS6Az3/kvsoqIG1zBivlEQ+5bYaQ TwOCxKZRfhUqZqCqt5ZP9V4VS28zm86Y08mo6hG5Pm04XEEf42dco0YTrHLr2w1rNQp3 t6/d0p5q+AbPIHudLtBJ3Ol59bsFbT4vL4XhRAKh0s34GkHNyF6OOfXDiZAqj6ZtgYbY NMSqFv0NE/V0f1kdebZUgvqWbmwFJ51furazBdphV+iIBhW0gGNLfHc47KlfjQOrWa6d jboA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZcvLul0onPyXzU6xRaVzSal0qmAndvw6jEh989OEllsYpPVKW HUsTm1fn11X385cvGHUqLnee057IcgkAsU2vFyQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPdXU6DOw9U29VR7LxDm0U18mdSsvDmZx47Pqx71H7PZbFFdWd4Pq8nthaa8VQpUECxiOclvljWfhGD9B7Nfg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:cbb:: with SMTP id cn27mr7737657edb.275.1606484892430; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 05:48:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: ian martins Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:47:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: consistent behavior across babel languages To: Neil Jerram Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.46; envelope-from=ianxm1@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f46.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Org-Mode mailing list Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.17 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=jhu.edu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: ZsRHilzCu5F+ On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:42 AM Neil Jerram wrote: > Wonderful, thank you. I have been thinking it would be nice to have a te= st suite along these lines, but detailed doc like this is more feasible and= maintainable. A test suite is a good idea as a next step to protect correct behaviors. I want to first look at actual behaviors and get agreement on correct behaviors first. On the other hand, each of the language's test suites should cover the same ground so a separate test suite may not make sense. > When time permits I will work on adding Scheme to this page. Great, thanks! > FWIW, I did not understand the "functional" and "scripting" terms that yo= u use on this page. > > I've understood now, from https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intr= o.html, that you mean "results: value" and "results: output". For me it wo= uld be better if you said that instead of "functional" and "scripting", as = the former is what I can actually type in my Org files. yes, it's in the manual as well [1], but I agree that alternating between two sets of terms here is unnecessarily confusing. Will change. [1] https://orgmode.org/manual/Results-of-Evaluation.html#Results-of-Evalua= tion