From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kDUIAC4lv1+JAgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:46:54 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 2EpuNy0lv1/IOQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:46:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D0A94006E for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57008 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8F8-0004DB-Sl for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:46:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8Du-0004Cs-IP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:45:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:45901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ki8Dr-0000yv-3i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:45:32 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id hb22so604608ejb.12 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:45:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4ZtKA5ILzN4oAa6dlUjEaNpaQ18jkj/FMrDhRmEl9Sw=; b=KWlYiVk5qaQN+fOV/j9Syw4xvLrEoz+hBWtu7DdyPlU8iBNh3DAWIvd+f/FDk2ttZN aDA5ND8usi+rKa4yBAcPRoauHbG70lazDFiJjThObBHKWrfz1ddKWwkuC4Q+T0HXSMWx VotEaYI5wL0Ac4rd2+JFFY4+isWLNo019zVLqbK0gB7GKSqYhJ+u0RRSmaC5g02igH+y Hp0tO+4gOUEpL7XEl4wy52HYSDVuyOVar0tnY4JHSraUTYnoAew0fivOJtPzqU0PhnUG 4l0w6l0sjhstq1fkoGbKShSgsXgJIanX3426nXB2P54je1Cd4azntKSoU9y7dXsU5VeH p4nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ds92tTFgPmP1/TSPmku4sF+7nOKwomTEOf9Q6oGVb5LcPBknP CxrZifs02YqcWXjtjqVvWqkoa9+2mwjFj2/l4yk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE9nOXeXAXAf1u/S83LOY+514lHNSFIwHPjj9M3gBobirVQtna3GuuWMX742/44hhz/3h9RNwA2jZsugpD2lU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2454:: with SMTP id a20mr982593ejb.208.1606362329613; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:45:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87sg8x7w6i.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: ian martins Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 22:45:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: consistent behavior across babel languages To: Tom Gillespie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.43; envelope-from=ianxm1@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f43.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tim Cross , emacs-orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: inc X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=jhu.edu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.91 X-TUID: YOSVvR9ZwrER On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:06 AM Tim Cross wrote: > > I will try to allocate time on the weekend to > review what you have and see if there are any I know of which you have > not included. That would be great. On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:39 PM Tom Gillespie wrote: > > Since there are so many different features that > a babel language implementation can support I don't want to try to put > them all in one table quite yet but I think it may be helpful to do so > eventually. Until that time does it make sense to add new sections to > the file that cover specific features? For example I have tests on > TRAMP support and/or support for execution via a remote session that I > would like to add from my internal notes. Can I add it as a new > section? Yes, definitely. My plan is to add sections for major features or feature groups and have a table for each section, and when that stops working to think of something else. I am planning a section for variables focusing on passing lists and tables which will probably look a lot like the section on returning list and tables. There should definitely be a section on TRAMP.