From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nathan Neff <nathan.neff@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Release 7.7
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:00:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC=HedDCdZfmG3O6dsmfkEu=BVxTKwZaGtB3jPWX+GFzVtcN1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87y5zi1y2d.fsf@gnu.org>
	<BA11FFD9-2AE1-42D2-8B57-A207C6B6A8FF@gilbert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46158)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nathan.neff@gmail.com>) id 1QmYck-0005IV-3b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nathan.neff@gmail.com>) id 1QmYcj-0000NK-3B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:10 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:45932)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nathan.neff@gmail.com>) id 1QmYcj-0000MR-0i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:09 -0400
Received: by vwm42 with SMTP id 42so152593vwm.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BA11FFD9-2AE1-42D2-8B57-A207C6B6A8FF@gilbert.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael C Gilbert <mcg@gilbert.org>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Michael C Gilbert <mcg@gilbert.org> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 3:47 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Allow relative time when scheduling/adding a deadline
>> ======================================================

How is this different from the previous behavior?  I thought it was always
possible to type +2d to schedule something 2 days in the future?

Thanks,
--Nate