Re: Moving my init.el to Org

[Grant Rettke <gcr@wisdomandwonder.com>]

Good morning,

There are as many /right ways/ to use `org' for *literate programming*
as there are flowers. They are all delightful and everyone has their own
personal preference.

My personal preference is to embrace /literate programming/ in the
truest sense of the word: the document everything. It is for humans, and
computers, and anything else that needs to read it in any form
whatsoever.

My primary audience is myself, but since I am an English speaking human
others may value it, too, but it is all personal preference.

Here are some direct links:
• [The human readable part]
• [The Emacs readable part]
• [All of the artifacts]

[The human readable part]
https://github.com/grettke/home/blob/master/TC3F.txt

[The Emacs readable part]
https://github.com/grettke/home/blob/master/.emacs.el

[All of the artifacts] https://github.com/grettke/home

Kind regards,

Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF
gcr@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson


On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> wrote:
> OK,
>
> so the time has come.  Either I'll declare .emacs bankruptcy soon, or
> I'll use Org-mode to structure it.
>
> I googled for a while, but couldn't find what I'm looking for: a list
> of options with hints (or links to hints) about how to get started, and
> possibly their pros and cons.
>
> I know that I could use org-babel-load-file, or outshine.  What are
> other possibilities?  What are the caveats (and advantages) of both
> (other?) ways?
>
> I am pretty sure that my question *can* be answered by RTFM (Worg
> page? some blog post?), so please link the FM if possible.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Marcin Borkowski
> http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
> Adam Mickiewicz University
>