Re: Fwd: request regarding code chunk options in org-babel.

[shripad sinari <shripad.sinari@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2053 bytes --]

Hello Eric,
The posted solution works. But the issue is that I have to do this a lot of
times for selective code chunks in multiple documents. Writing the sexp
each time is not very elegant. Besides, if I were to come up with some
solution than I did not want  it to break anything else. Perhaps my
question is still ambiguous and the right question should be does value of
":results" plist overrride the one from ":exports", i.e., is there any
precedence order to the chunk options that is implicit, that i have not yet
grasped from the documentation?

Thanks for your patience and help.
Regards,
Shripad.

Shripad
Tucson, AZ


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>wrote:

> shripad sinari <shripad.sinari@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hello all,
> >  I have been using org-mode and particularly org-babel for reproducible
> > research. From reading most of the code chunk options in the org manual
> >  it seems that the follwoing table would be how one would expect output
> > in various formats to behave:
> >
> > | :results value | :exports value | In Buffer | In PDF | Evaluation |
> > |----------------+----------------+-----------+--------+------------|
> > | silent         | results        | no        | yes    | yes        |
> > | replace/other  | none           | yes       | no     | yes        |
> > | silent         | none           | no        | no     | yes        |
> >
>
> Perhaps the documentation should be changed to more clearly express that
> adding ":results silent" will inhibit insertion of results in the buffer
> even during export.
>
> >
> > However from this thread:
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/46625
>
> Is there a reason that the solution posted in that thread does not work
> for you?
>
> Best,
>
> >
> >  it appears that this is not the case. Is there a way, to get this
> > table to be valid out of the box? This might be useful.
> >
> > Please let me know.
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Shripad
> > Tucson, AZ
>
> --
> Eric Schulte
> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3071 bytes --]