From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleh Krehel <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Could org-mode use `completing-read-function' instead of
 `org-icompleting-read'?
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:35:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA01p3rN=9Fby_1giidsX7fw0D2y5ZWMEnz6HDDiHVtxQXOXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA01p3q3bKhvc4j4uXWj7MMO=sStjeYiFcZ9U6m1mQh=uH_Z8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87egnk17wg.fsf@gmx.us>
	<CAA01p3r4TB8mEwAZS+z4eb_0LWo1PRHSHQ+G8V_6Ht-75Wc77w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87egnkt7yv.fsf@gmx.us>
	<CAA01p3r=347vt8-ZZ26VSYGCFE=K4A9zfH7R3yLEPjoGu8WVVg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44950)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1YilpW-0004Bg-TR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:35:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1YilpV-0002nn-Tj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:35:50 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:38830)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1YilpV-0002nX-N6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:35:49 -0400
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so101931738wiu.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA01p3r=347vt8-ZZ26VSYGCFE=K4A9zfH7R3yLEPjoGu8WVVg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>> I don't know how to use helm of ivy.  But I think the attached patch is
>> better.  Would that work with helm and ivy?

Yes, both work fine.

> I could live with it, but basically `org-completion-use-ido` says "I
> don't care if you've temporarily disabled `ido-mode' or not, I'll use
> ido anyway". This isn't a good approach, especially considering that
> `ido-mode' is already a convenient minor mode.
> Maybe `org-completion-use-ido' should be completely removed, and ido completion
> should be used automatically when `ido-mode' is on.

Oops, just noticed that `ido-mode' is actually in the condition.
All is fine then.

Except that iswitchb is obsolete. Should we remove it?

Oleh