From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ista Zahn Subject: Re: Stable releases Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPEMl-00022x-N5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:33:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPEMk-0000qY-OX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:33:39 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]:35145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPEMk-0000qK-JT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:33:38 -0400 Received: by qgj62 with SMTP id 62so120723625qgj.2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:33:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Scott Randby Cc: emacs-org list On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Scott Randby wrote: > While I've used Org's development version in the past, I stopped doing that > due to my failure to learn how to use git (no time) and other issues. Now, I > only use the stable releases. But the latest 8.3 release doesn't seem so > stable to me, so I'd like some clarification about what the Org maintainers > mean by a stable release. Perhaps this is too vague, so let me explain a > bit. [snip] > > I guess what I want to know, and maybe there is no answer, is how long > should I wait before upgrading to a stable release? One strategy is keeping an eye on the mailing list and waiting for bug reports to die down before upgrading. Org is by far the most > important piece of software I use (I hate it when I can't use Org), and bugs > (which I know can't be avoided) make it hard, even impossible, for me to get > my real work done. If there is a way for me to minimize encountering bugs, I > will appreciate a description of that way. > > Scott Randby >