Re: specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block

[Ista Zahn <istazahn@gmail.com>]

Can't you just do

#+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
   hello world
#+end_src

?

Best,
Ista


On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah <drorata@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
> language of the result?
>
> Cheers,
> Dror
>
> ----------
> Mahalo Tom,
>
> It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block.  That said, it
> would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
> specification.
>
> Greg
>
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
>> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code.  I'd like to be able
>>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
>>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot".  Using :results value
>>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
>>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code.  Is
>>> there a way to specify the coding language
>>> of a generated #+RESULTS  src block?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>> Aloha Greg,
>>
>> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that
>> generates dot code.
>>
>> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix
>> #+header: :file temp.pdf
>> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf
>> #+header: :results output
>> #+BEGIN_SRC dot
>> $input
>> #+END_SRC
>>
>> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?
>>
>> All the best,
>> Tom
>>
>> --
>> Thomas S. Dye
>> http://www.tsdye.com