I'm getting an error on HEAD now: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function org-add-props) (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found from where org.el is loaded." nil (quote face) (quote org-warning)) (message (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found from where org.el is loaded." nil (quote face) (quote org-warning))) (condition-case nil (load (concat (file-name-directory load-file-name) "org-loaddefs.el") nil t t t) (error (message (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could be found from where org.el is loaded." nil (qu$ (or (equal this-command (quote eval-buffer)) (condition-case nil (load (concat (file-name-directory load-file-name) "org-loaddefs.el") nil t t t) (error (message (org-add-props "WARNING: No org-loaddefs.el file could b$ eval-buffer(# nil "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el" nil t) ; Reading at buffer position 3681 load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el" "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/vendor/org-mode/lisp/org.el" nil t) require(org) eval-buffer(# nil "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el" nil t) ; Reading at buffer position 127 load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el" "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/lisp/init-org.el" nil t) require(init-org) eval-buffer(# nil "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el" nil t) ; Reading at buffer position 2043 load-with-code-conversion("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el" "/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init.el" t t) load("/Users/nslater/.emacs.d/init" t t) #[0 "^H\205\262^@ \306=\203^Q^@\307^H\310Q\202;^@ \311=\204^^^@\307^H\312Q\202;^@\313\307\314\315#\203*^@\316\202;^@\313\307\314\317#\203:^@\320\nB^R\321\202;^@\316\322^S\323^A\322\211#\210^K\322=\203a^@\324\325\32$ command-line() normal-top-level() On 30 May 2014 14:15, Bastien wrote: > Hi Noah, > > Noah Slater writes: > > > That's pretty cool. Any reason it doesn't use the same syntax as the > > :tstart param though? > > I first want to see if the new feature is useful before adding up more > subfeatures. So let's wait until 8.3 is released and see if (more) > people want more flexibility here. In the meantime, I think it makes > sense to offer the predefined ranges that we can use in org clock > tables. > > > This breaks a function I had written (and perhaps other people's > > functions). > > This is now fixed, thanks, > > -- > Bastien >