From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: wolfram's computable document format
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:35:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+M2ft_SvHDiQUzCVTekmpuQwxonbo=jBTuV=BW=33DQbAsvSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH+cfaff5N96BoRSF+kvAwa55Gsx8G6tkm2tV7CGPRt-ULbKEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E28FFAA.5020508@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58750)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1QmTY9-0002tZ-1V
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:35:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1QmTY7-0003xm-Dn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:35:04 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:59461)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1QmTY7-0003xA-9O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:35:03 -0400
Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so2140650wwf.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E28FFAA.5020508@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Scott Randby <srandby@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 05:41 PM, David O'Toole wrote:
>> http://www.wolfram.com/cdf/
>>
>> Looks nice, and could be very interesting to orgmoders.
>>
>>
>
> Mathematica is required to make a CDF document and the required reader
> is at least 100 MB in size. I think Sage is a superior alternative.
>

I'm all for this... but can Sage do what CDF is doing? Or publish to CDF?

In other words, is Sage really an "alternative" in this instance if
it's not actually providing the same feature set?


John

> Scott Randby
>
>