From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Org Mode Research Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 17:47:14 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87mvf2ha8e.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQ0hh-0007BU-BF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 18:47:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQ0hg-000149-4O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 18:47:17 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]:36706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cQ0hf-000143-V6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 18:47:16 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id j13so3148658iod.3 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:47:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Ted Wiles Cc: Colin Baxter , emacs-orgmode On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Ted Wiles wrote: > Thanks all! [snip] > I get the concern on GPL vs. non-GPL, > I also really like org mode as it fundamentally gives me control over my own > data, but given where this is right now (a google forms survey) I think it's > kind of a moot discussion. But which is it; you get the concern but don't answer either way? I take this to imply that if this *does* bloom into something it will be non-GPL? John > > Thanks again, > Ted > > > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Colin Baxter wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> On Sat, Jan 07 2017, Ted Wiles wrote: >> >> > Org Moders, >> > >> > I'm doing some research on org mode usage and would love to hear your >> > perspective. Here's the >> > survey link: >> > >> > https://goo.gl/forms/9I0uL3Er2TuEszfH3 >> > >> > If I get enough responses, I'll be happy to post the results online for >> > all to see! >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Ted >> >> I would want to see much more information about the motive and people >> behind the Survey before I would take part. Sorry. > >