On Mar 13, 2014 5:49 PM, "Andreas Leha" <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So what is your suggestion for the OP to achieve what he is after?
> >>>>> noexport and noeval at the same time.
> >>>>>
> >
> > I'm jumping in half way through here,
>
> Thanks for jumping in.
>
> > but wouldn't setting the :noeval
> > property to "yes" and :export property to "none" on the subtree work?
>
> Well, the property-setting works, but that is really cumbersome.  In a
> typical org file, it takes 5 keystrokes to toggle the :noexport: tag
> (C-c C-c n TAB RET).  But I do not want to count the keystrokes it take
> to additionally set these properties.
>
> Just to confirm.  This is what you suggest, correct?
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * test
>
> ** Not exported                                                    :noexport:
>    :PROPERTIES:
>    :noeval: "yes"
>    :export: "none"
>    :END:
>    #+BEGIN_SRC ditaa :file test.png :cmdline -E
>           +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>       x   | 0 cRED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
>           +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>    #+END_SRC
>
> ** blah blah
>    blah blah blah
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>
>
> >
> > One may also want to COMMENT the subtree to inhibit it's export
> > wholepiece (not just code blocks).
>
> This does not seem to work, as the test.png is also created here.
>
> Again, just to confirm.  This is your suggestion, correct?
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * test
>
> ** COMMENT Not exported
>    #+BEGIN_SRC ditaa :file test.png :cmdline -E
>           +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>       x   | 0 cRED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
>           +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>    #+END_SRC
>
> ** blah blah
>    blah blah blah
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>
> So, my question to this thread is: What is the easiest way to disable a
> subtree during export completely so that also none of the code blocks is
> evaluated (regardless of its :session argument).
>
> Or even more precisely: Couldn't the COMMENT keyword do exactly that?  I
> do not expect code from inside a COMMENT subtree to be considered during
> export.
>

Can we track down why I got different results for R vs. ditaa in my message above? Couldn't we be chasing our tails if this is ditaa specific?

R is behaving like expected (no eval if tree marked noexport), ditaa is not.

John

>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>
>