From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: org to static site? Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:17:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170531150856.GN16590@volibear.adamsinfoserv.com> <20170531151710.4lkbxgec53neivnw@broggs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dG6Jq-0001Ch-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:17:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dG6Jp-0003u6-H8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:17:58 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]:35674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dG6Jp-0003ts-BI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:17:57 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f72so15963552ite.0 for ; Wed, 31 May 2017 09:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Puneeth Chaganti Cc: Jeffrey Brent McBeth , emacs-orgmode On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote: > I really wrestled with getting it to behave initially. I hope the > intro to the docs is a joke, as either I'm an idiot or the author > definitely failed :) > - https://getnikola.com/handbook.html > > "DON'T READ THIS MANUAL. IF YOU NEED TO READ IT I FAILED, JUST USE THE > THING." > > > To be fair to the author, org support is not built into Nikola, and is > coming through a plugin (by yours truly). The remote calls to Emacs for > compiling, and other ugly stuff can make it harder than necessary to deal > with. Understood, and I just meant in general (not org integration). This was a bit tongue in cheek; I don't think anyone would *expect* that something like this could be used without a manual. It's complicated and takes a bit to parse, just like any other software! I think it's great thus far, but can't fathom how someone could "pick it up" and start using it from scratch with no docs. John > - Puneeth