From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Limit on length of babel block #+name: value? Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:00:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87txm3p1p8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdRl3-0006pk-FJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:00:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdRky-0002GY-P5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:00:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:53592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdRky-0002Az-IC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 17:00:04 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r11so806681lbv.10 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 14:00:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87txm3p1p8.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode I can't replicate anymore, though I did just update Org. Perhaps I should have fiddled with it more before doing that... If it happens again, I'll dig into it. Thanks for double checking/attempting to replicate -- must be on my end. John On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Eric Schulte wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> I was just completely baffled for about 5-10 straight minutes as to >> why my block was not producing a results section with my generated >> graphics file from an R block. >> >> I kept double checking my header options one by one despite having >> simply copied/pasted/modified it from a previous working block. Turns >> out it appears that #+name has a character limit! >> >> This (on Org-mode version 8.0.2 (release_8.0.2-65-g1e32d7)), doesn't work: >> >> #+name: improvement-treatment >> >> It appears the name can be 20 characters long (the above is 21). >> > > I don't think there is any name length limit. The attached example > works for me, and exports w/o problem to HTML. Maybe I'm not using the > block in the same way as you, but I'm pretty confident there is no name > limit and your problem probably lies elsewhere. > > > > Best, > >> >> Is this by design or something I accidentally uncovered? Forgive me if >> it's come up before or is documented. I did a couple searches but >> didn't see it. >> >> >> Thanks, >> John >> > > -- > Eric Schulte > http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte >