From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Assistance with patching instructions on Worg Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:27:49 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87y51veqo3.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbwzep4r.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WA0KT-0007GF-Gf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:56:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9yxa-0005Yc-VB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 10:29:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]:60144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9yxa-0005YS-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 10:27:50 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id vb8so6927797obc.17 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 07:27:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Josiah Schwab Cc: emacs-orgmode Just confirming the change of Worg. I used the same format specified in the Worg git page: - Changed page: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#sec-4-2 - Worg git referred to: http://orgmode.org/worg/worg-git.html Having seen that page, I wondered if it should instructions to use `git add file.ext` if files are created? I left that alone for now, figuring that I'm at a lower-than-most level of git intelligence :) By the way, I love that Worg updates immediately now! John On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:59 PM, John Hendy wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Josiah Schwab wrote: >> >> jw.hendy@gmail.com writes: >> >>> I was just following along with Worg, which doesn't mention doing >>> that. I'm now thinking that `git add` must be implied in the line >>> =make some changes (1)=? >> >> Yes, I agree; as written, there is an implicit `git add`. I think it >> would be reasonable to make that explicit. > > Will do, and thanks for the quick assistance all! > > John > >> >> Best, >> Josiah