From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: Running babel blocks in :noexport: sections Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:23:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mwz7r09r.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSWa1-0005zP-Kz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:23:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSWa0-0004x9-As for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:23:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:54409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSWa0-0004wy-5L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:23:20 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id va7so4504369obc.0 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:23:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mwz7r09r.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Eric Schulte wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> For papers and beamer presentations, I sometimes hide more "universal" >> babel blocks inside a sort of setup headline. I thought I'd done this >> before, but perhaps not... The idea would be like so: >> >> * Data setup :noexport: >> >> #+begin_src R :session r >> >> load libraries >> read data files >> do universal operations >> >> #+end_src >> >> * Slide >> >> #+begin_src R :session r :exports results :results output graphics >> >> subset(larger_data_set_from_above) >> processing >> plot something >> >> #+end_src >> >> I noticed today that my :noexport: setup sections (I had a couple) >> were not updating. I re-defined a variable name further down in my >> file and it was re-using the definition from an above setup section >> (tagged with :noexport:). Just because I don't want it export doesn't >> mean I don't want to have useful stuff in the headline... >> >> Is this a bug/inappropriate setting, desirable based on how others use >> :noexport: headlines, or would others see value in executing babel >> blocks in :noexport: headlines? >> >> If I /didn't/ want it executed, I'd use :execute no. >> >> >> Thanks for any input, >> John >> > > Instead of tagging the headline as :noexport: you can add the COMMENT > flag to it. This should result in your desired behavior. See the > attached example. > > Brilliant. That'll do just fine. Never knew about that! John > > -- > Eric Schulte > http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte >