From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:28:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+M2ft-dHp1m_-mAueY_CZFvnNqe0Kkzuu5B=AVuO5NxiWpJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+M2ft_N1GwPi+xBuhs=C7Ykwe6=xo4REeXAuOacsJ4BXx4mGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<m1ip4p1xav.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44065)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1UHNwd-0002Ug-4N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:28:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1UHNwa-0002EC-Uu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:28:55 -0400
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:50463)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jw.hendy@gmail.com>) id 1UHNwa-0002E3-ME
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:28:52 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m4so4209405lbo.28
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1ip4p1xav.fsf@tsdye.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong if this is the behavior I'm getting, or is
>> the documentation incorrect and I shouldn't be quoting these options?
>
> Nicolas cleaned up the attribute syntax recently.  Previously, quotes
> were needed and backslashes were escaped.  Now, quotes are not used and
> backslashes don't need to be escaped.  Multi-word options are fine
> without quotes.
>

Thanks, Tom. Having an issue, though. From what I've read/heard...
=3D:width=3D is used for all backends now? This seems to be indicated by
this pretty recent post as well:
- http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68306

#+begin_quote Aaron Ecay

Eliminating subtleties is precisely the point of this change.  All(-ish)*
backends now use :width.

* As far as I=E2=80=99ve checked, HTML(+ derived backends) and LaTeX(+deriv=
ed
backends).  If there are any that don=E2=80=99t, they should probably be pa=
tched
to do so as well.

#+end_quote

Using #+attr_html :width 200px results in <img src=3D"" :width 200px
alt=3D"" /> for me.

Why isn't :width for html being parsed into width=3D"200px" ?

:options width=3D"200px" works properly... but then again, I thought we
did away with :options var=3D"value" syntax.

Just trying to keep up!


Thanks,
John

> hth,
> Tom
>
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com