Clock connection between the files

Clock connection between the files

[Vladimir Nikishkin]

Hello, everyone.

I have a strange situation. I have a file where I track my used time.
I have another file, in which I write a literate-style book. So I
clock-in in the first file, then open the second one and start
working.

Recently I wrote some terrible code which made my second file blow up
in size to 19 Mb, and I had to kill Emacs.

After restarting Emacs, I wanted to clock-in into the dangling clock
in the first file, but when I type C-c C-x C-i, (!) Emacs asks whether
to open the second file, warning that it is large.
The actual message is "File file2.org is large (19.7M), really open? (y, or n)"

How come org knows the connection between the first and the second
file? There are not any references to the second file in the first one
whatsoever.

Thanks everyone.

-- 
Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin

Re: Clock connection between the files

[Bastien]

Hi Vladimir,

Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com> writes:

> How come org knows the connection between the first and the second
> file? There are not any references to the second file in the first one
> whatsoever.

I cannot reproduce the problem.  Can you reproduce it (without adding
that much contents to the second file)?  Otherwise I don't see where
the error can come from.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: Clock connection between the files

[Vladimir Nikishkin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 899 bytes --]

I don't remember any more how this worked out, sorry.

I only remember that #+latex_header, if set in a wrong way, breaks almost
everything. One of the things it's breaking is C-c C-j, but it actually
breaks more.

Moreover, I had both files in the agenda list, so this may be a potential
"mis-coupling".

But I sent faithfully reenact the setup of March.

Sorry

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> 於 2020年5月24日 週日 19:54 寫道：

> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > How come org knows the connection between the first and the second
> > file? There are not any references to the second file in the first one
> > whatsoever.
>
> I cannot reproduce the problem.  Can you reproduce it (without adding
> that much contents to the second file)?  Otherwise I don't see where
> the error can come from.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>  Bastien
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1540 bytes --]