From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com>
Subject: ob-scheme doesn't support :stdin?
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:45:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+A2iZYqTQ3ZopgNhu0JpuShKRdtQXJ2qeWr2ULURs5PkWrRJA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50881)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <lockywolf@gmail.com>) id 1isf3d-0006cw-0T
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:45:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <lockywolf@gmail.com>) id 1isf3c-0001Tt-3J
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:45:56 -0500
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::533]:40928)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lockywolf@gmail.com>) id 1isf3b-0001T1-Tn
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:45:56 -0500
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id b8so24187489edx.7
 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:45:55 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello, friends.

Is it true that ob-scheme doesn't support :stdin <blockname>?

I just tried, and doesn't seem to work, although it works with ob-shell.

(This is not a complaint, I just would like to confirm that I
understand things correctly.)

-- 
Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin