From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Bernoulli Subject: Re: Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:11:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874m1krwk5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877f5xaedv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed0da4c2b650546153c62 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWY4-0007X0-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:11:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWY4-00032e-5P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:11:44 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]:35828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSWY3-00032a-Vc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:11:44 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id j18so68346567ioe.2 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:11:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k29xv897.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-Mode mailing list , "Charles C. Berry" --001a113ed0da4c2b650546153c62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > > Could you show an ECM? > I was going to, but: Turns out: 1. Whether -i is used doesn't matter here. 2. The reason these blocks are not intended the same way is that SRC => @example or @lisp EXAMPLE => @verbatim 3. What bothered me wasn't so much the additional indention, but the inconsistency. I actually like it better with the extra indentation, and I also think that this is what we are suppposed to do in Texinfo. So I am redefining org-texinfo-example-block to use @example instead of @verbatim. Best regards, Jonas --001a113ed0da4c2b650546153c62 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr= > wrote:

Could you show an ECM?

I was goi= ng to, but:=C2=A0

Turns out:
1. Whether = -i is used doesn't matter here.
2. The reason these blocks ar= e not intended the same way is that
=C2=A0 =C2=A0SRC =3D> @exa= mple or @lisp
=C2=A0 =C2=A0EXAMPLE =3D> @verbatim
3.= What bothered me wasn't so much the additional indention, but the inco= nsistency. I actually like it better with the extra indentation, and I also= think that this is what we are suppposed to do in Texinfo. So I am redefin= ing=C2=A0org-texinfo-example-block to use @example instead of @verbatim.

Best regards,
Jonas

--001a113ed0da4c2b650546153c62--