From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: [babel] Trouble with :cache yes Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:00:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39252 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2QTz-0007cp-Fn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:00:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2QTx-0004CO-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:00:27 -0400 Received: from mailout1-trp.thomsonreuters.com ([163.231.6.6]:43301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2QTx-0004Bi-Rp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:00:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: r.m.krug@gmail.com, schulte.eric@gmail.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 3/23/11 1:46 AM, "Rainer M Krug" wrote: > >When exporting to a pdf, I get the following matrix in the pdf: > > [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] >[1,] 0.5626863 0.8397120 0.9886886 0.2233873 >[2,] 0.8697064 0.1101432 0.1372992 0.4114674 >[3,] 0.3548678 0.5658843 0.1608864 0.5809167 > >And it is different after each export. So it seems that the code block >*is* actually evaluated, despite of the cached info. > >Rainer Yes, that's exactly the behavior I'm seeing too. Caching seems to have no effect on HTML export, no matter whether the block already has a "#+results" section or not. -Ken