From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org-mode CSS property export bug Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:25:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y6gf5g6x.fsf@gmx.de> <877hnycuqf.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O5KlU-0005iz-SB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:26:00 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50973 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5KlS-0005iq-QB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:26:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5KlL-0004Df-NH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:25:53 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:58958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5KlL-0004DW-J6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:25:51 -0400 Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so681341wyf.0 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 08:25:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877hnycuqf.fsf@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Rick Moynihan writes: >> As far as I can see there are three options. >> >> 1) Use underscores (against the above advice) (practically probably >> not a huge issue) e.g. outline-container-1_1 >> 2) Overload the use of hyphens to be for both spaces and .'s... e.g >> outline-container-1-1 >> 3) Stop using hyphens for spaces and switch to camel case convention, >> freeing hyphens to be substitutes for .'s e.g. outlineContainer1-1. >> This option seems like the best design, though it completely blows >> backwards compatability away so is probably a non-starter. Leaving >> us >> with 1) or 2). >> >> Personally I think *if* underscores aren't a problem for modern >> browsers, ie8, firefox 3.5+, recent opera's safari and chrome we use >> them. > > Allright then. > > > He says: > > "Internet Explorer 6 for Windows, published after the errata, permits > underscores and escaped underscores." > > So do IE4x and IE5x. > Internet Explorer seems not to be the problem? IE7+ anyone? > > > "Opera 3.x through 5.x does not recognize underscores or escaped > underscores, and so acts the same as Navigator 4.x in this regard." > > Very old browsers. Do we have to support them? I don't think so. - Carsten > > > > The appended testfile works in Opera10 an FF 3.6. Is there something > missing? > > > > Sebastian > > > - Carsten