From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aankhen <aankhen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] footnotes improvements
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:40:23 +0530
Message-ID: <BANLkTinHOzD0ajCbhGWwgMxgA7TtYRsmMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <871v05f4ca.fsf@gmail.com> <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49358)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aankhen@gmail.com>) id 1QKR0N-0006QB-RI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aankhen@gmail.com>) id 1QKR0J-00020C-QW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:19 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:61313)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aankhen@gmail.com>) id 1QKR0J-000207-O8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 04:12:15 -0400
Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4so1231963vws.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: mail@christianmoe.com, Org mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Christian,

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:49, Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> wrote:
> Nice! Tested only your snippet.
>
>
> * HTML: works!
>
> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'.
> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between them:`2,3'?
>
> For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be flexib=
ly
> added with CSS like:
>
> : #+style: <style>sup + sup .footref:before {content: ", "}</style>

>From the point of view of semantics, it=E2=80=99d be better to separate the=
m
in the content itself.  For my part, I like Wikipedia=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98[1=
][2]=E2=80=99
style.  =E2=80=981, 2=E2=80=99 sounds even better to me, if it can be done.

Aankhen