From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avdi Grimm <groups@inbox.avdi.org>
Subject: Re: Literate Programming - Continue a Source Block?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:25 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTin4CfKQJ_-hp5XenPssp5660_DkLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87pqmokh6d.fsf@fester.com> <80k4cw22uf.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87fwnkjqoh.fsf@fester.com> <87mxhsnmcf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<877h8wj9za.fsf@fester.com>
Reply-To: avdi@avdi.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60464)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avdi@inbox.avdi.org>) id 1QUtl4-0001Np-Tw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avdi@inbox.avdi.org>) id 1QUtl3-0000k1-T3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:46 -0400
Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:55602)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avdi@inbox.avdi.org>) id 1QUtl3-0000jw-Nu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:55:45 -0400
Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so1447418qwa.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <877h8wj9za.fsf@fester.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Neeum Zawan <mailinglists@nawaz.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Neeum Zawan <mailinglists@nawaz.org> wrote:
> n this case, yes. In a real programming project, it could be a number
> of them. For example, I may have a code block dedicated to
> imports/includes which I want to be on the top of the file - and I may
> have to append to that when adding a new feature.

Ooh! Ooh! Me too!

I was just wanting this the other day. I wanted to be able to do:

    #+srcname: requires
    #+begin_src ruby
      require 'library_a'
    #+end_src

     ...

    #+srcname: requires
    #+begin_src ruby
      require 'library_b'
    #+end_src

And then tie it all together with:

    #+begin_src ruby :tangle foo.rb
      <<requires>>
    #+end

But no such luck. <<requires>> just picked up the most recent block
with that srcname, IIRC.

-- 
Avdi Grimm
http://avdi.org