From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aankhen <aankhen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: export options toc:t depends on num:t
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:50:12 +0530
Message-ID: <BANLkTim24tqLMGVAjaY7LUmVugXGrXuHDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=K8d9YUiyH22XMdv8dez1s3AZSCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8162qshtms.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47611 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7Oui-0005MF-3p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:20:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aankhen@gmail.com>) id 1Q7Oug-0004Qa-8J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:20:35 -0400
Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:36743)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aankhen@gmail.com>) id 1Q7Oug-0004QU-30
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:20:34 -0400
Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20so1206366vxk.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8162qshtms.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:18, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
> [snip]
>> Maybe this is obvious to most, but I was puzzled by it. It seems that
>> ,---
>> | #+options: toc:t
>> `---
>>
>> will not function when paired with:
>> ,---
>> | #+options: toc:t num:nil
>> `---
> [snip]
>
> Is this a LaTeX specific behaviour? I don't see anything odd with HTML
> export.

It likely is specific to LaTeX.  The starred versions of the
sectioning commands suppress the entry in the TOC as well.  It=E2=80=99s
possible to manually add the entry regardless, so maybe that needs to
be special-cased in the exporter.  It=E2=80=99d look like this:

,----
| \phantomsection                 % to make PDF bookmarks work properly
| \section*{Introduction}
| \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Introduction}
`----

Alternatively, use the regular sectioning commands but add this before
\begin{document}:

,----
| \setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
`----

Aankhen