From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Bug: create latex png while export to HTML become very slow [6.35i] Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:52:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ochkacxm.fsf@gmail.com> <8D636DAF-5D4C-4846-A432-7B544131B50D@gmail.com> <10559.1271390362@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87iq7rm5xh.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <13511.1271454603@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2tUe-0000VL-VL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:33 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37481 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2tUc-0000UH-Vt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2tUa-0004E2-VO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:30 -0400 Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.146]:54486) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2tUa-0004Dy-OY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:54:28 -0400 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so208430eyg.34 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:54:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <13511.1271454603@alphaville.usa.hp.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Bernt Hansen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Lucas Peng On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Bernt Hansen wrote: > >> Lucas Peng writes: >> >>> Thanks for your prompt response, >>> >>> 1. I get "Org-mode version 6.35i" with M-x org-version. >> >> Strange. The current latest tagged version in the git repo is >> release_6.35g >> >> We haven't gotten to 'i' yet unless you've come back from the >> future ;) >> > > I was confused by that too, but the tarball on the website says > 6.35i, so > my guess was that Carsten forgot to add tags to the git tree. The tags are there, but I pushed them from a branch. - Carsten