From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan Schmitt" Subject: Re: Summary of syntax? Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:16:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <72B0EE37-7104-4359-9B62-A179E200877E@polytechnique.org> <87k4451tyy.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rssms-0004zV-7Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:17:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rssmm-0004Lv-Ed for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:17:01 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:32048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rssml-0004Le-RC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:16:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k4451tyy.fsf@tsdh.uni-koblenz.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2 Feb 2012, at 10:10, Tassilo Horn wrote: >> I wanted to know more about this syntax (colon at the start of the >> line), so I went to the manual and searched for it. > > Here it is. > > ,----[ (info "(org)Literal examples") ] > | For simplicity when using small examples, you can also start > | the example lines with a colon followed by a space. There may also > be > | additional whitespace before the colon: > | > | Here is an example > | : Some example from a text file. > `---- Thanks a lot (and thanks Jambunathan K as well). >> Unfortunately I could not find it, nor could I find a summary of the >> syntax for org files. >> >> Is there a syntax reference card somewhere? > > Not that I know of... This would be most useful: I don't think I could have found this by myself, except knowing the name of what I was searching for. Maybe I should do it (it would be a nice way to really learn the syntax). Alan